Inerrancy

Ξ November 23rd, 2009 | → | ∇ Life |

One of religion’s more absurd assertions has to be the claim for the inerrancy of the Bible. This claim is still made by many despite the fact that we now know that Matthew and Luke took Marcan material and incorporated it into their own gospels freely changing, correcting, editing, and deleting from and adding to Mark. This was not done infrequently. How can any one of these things be done to "the inerrant word of God".There are thousands of other illustrations of "bad" Biblical literalism. These will suffice until you do your own research.

 

2 Responses to ' Inerrancy '

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to ' Inerrancy '.

  1. Michael said,

    on November 24th, 2009 at 10:05 am

    My favorite is just sitting down and writing out the journalstic (who/what/when/where/etc…) facts of the gospels’ resurrection accounts. There are entire books out there that try to explain the discrepancies, while avoiding the most likely conclusion that those documents may not be 100% accurate.

  2. Don said,

    on November 24th, 2009 at 11:39 am

    So you too have noticed….I’m anxious to pick up Spong’s book, “Resurrection: Myth or Reality.

    He is one of my favorite authors. I think I know what he is going to say, but I want to read it from him.

Leave a reply


  • "You've got me all wrong". -God
  • We are all led to the truth for which we are ready
  • "The only prayer to ever say is a prayer of gratitude."
  • "I have come that they might have LIFE, and have it more abundantly" (Jesus speaks according to: JOHN 10:10)
  • Visitors


    Since
    October 2007
  • Recent Posts

  • Recent Comments

  • Don Rogers's Facebook profile
  • ReadABlog.com Blog Search Engine